|
|
|
|
The
Eighteenth century was a period with a distinctive character
of its own within the history of civilization and medical knowledge,
and is sometimes extremely difficult to pigeonhole neatly. The
century is generally presented to us as one of frivolity: all
fops and powdered ladies. This is certainly true. But the Eighteenth
century was first and foremost the century of enlightenment,
of reason and sometimes of a determined break with anything
connected with the darkness of the past.
The Eighteenth century brought amazing discoveries in all fields
of human knowledge. In the beginning at least, philosophy was
still a great influence in the field of scientific thought in
general and medicine in particular due to the typically enlightenment
view that all problems may be resolved through the application
of pure reason. As the century progressed, the discipline of
medicine began to be dominated less by philosophy and more by
scientists working within physical and natural disciplines.
In the Seventeenth century, doctors were divided between Iatrochemists
(who believed that the body is a kind of chemical laboratory,
a factory where various functions are performed spiritually
through virtues residing within individual organs) and Iatrophysicists
(a much more experimentalist and Galilean movement, which saw
the human body as a true machine within which functions took
place in accordance with mathematically measurable mechanical
laws). In the Eighteenth century, the discipline of medicine
was dominated by two diametrically opposite concepts: vitalism
(which claimed that a vital force lay at the basis of life)
and mechanism (which claimed that vital phenomena are characterized
by matter and movement and thus subject to physical laws).
The main medical movements which began to
become apparent during the first half of the Eighteenth century
subsequently formed the basis for true schools of thought.
These may be summarized as follows:
1. ANIMISTIC MOVEMENT, G. E. Stahl;
2. BIOLOGICAL MECHANISTIC MOVEMENT; F. Hoffmann;
3. VITALISTIC MOVEMENT, J. Brown.
Two great medical systems arose from a new trend toward the
systematic (i.e. the construction of systems of thoughts,
of doctrines) and the influence of romanticism on eighteenth
century medicine
1. MESMERISM, F. Mesmer;
2. HOMEOPATHY, C. F. S. Hahnemann.
While the Sixteenth
century placed science on a new footing and the Seventeenth
century opened up new horizons of study through the introduction
of microscopic anatomy, it was not until the Eighteenth century
that Anatomy finally began to become an accepted part of clinical
medicine. Normal Human Anatomy had some eminent proponents
during this century, particularly in Italy. The most distinguished
scientist of his century, G.B. Morgagni, was a native of Forlì.
This renowned anatomist and founding father of the discipline
of pathological anatomy (the study of disease-induced changes
in organs) described, amongst other things, the urethral glands.
He also improved medical understanding of the insertions of
the sternothyroid and hyothyroid muscles and was responsible
for describing the highest nasal concha (known as Morgagnis
concha) and the nodules of the pulmonary artery sigmoid valves.
G. B. Bianchi (1681-1761), a contemporary of Morgagnis, was
called in 1720 to teach Anatomy at the University of Turin.
He was particularly interested in the tear ducts and genital
organs. Another famous contemporary of Morgagni and Bianchi
was the Venetian Giandomenico Santorini (1681-1737) who was
author, in 1724, of Observationes anatomicae. His particular
area of interest was the central nervous system. He showed
that the brain was not a gland as was commonly thought at
that time. He also studied the muscles of the tongue and epiglottis.
Another distinguished anatomist, one of the greatest of his
century, was the German B. Sigfrido Weiss (1683-1771) who
was better known by the Latinized version of his name, Albinus.
He wrote De ossibus corporis humani (1726) and a work devoted
to myology (study of muscles) entitled Historia musculorum
hominis in 1754. Weiss was also known for his notes to the
anatomical tables of Bartolomeo Eustachio. Another celebrated
anatomist, L. Heister (1685-1758), devoted himself to the
specific field of splanchnology (study of the viscera or internal
organs of the human body).
Heister was able to provide an exact description of blood
vessels by injecting them with mercury. His name is linked
to the spiral valve of the cystic duct (Heisters valve). These
advances within anatomy brought great advances in the discipline
of physiology (study of the functions of the human body) due
to the efforts of A. von Haller (1708-1777), a native of Bern.
Von Haller was not only the father of physiology but also
a student of embryology (study of the evolutionary stages
of bodies from conception to birth) and teratology (study
of monsters, particularly fetal). The Italian biologist and
naturalist L. Spallanzani (1729-1799) also deservedly occupies
a prominent position in the history of physiology.
Spallanzani added his authoritative voice to the long debate
over the argument of spontaneous generation (at one time it
was believed that simpler living organisms could arise spontaneously
and were not derived from other organisms, although this theory
is no longer accepted). He took the side of the advocates
of pre-existence who claimed that all living beings (even
the simplest) are derived from other living beings. Spallanzini
showed that infusorians (single-celled organisms which appear
if an organic substance is left to decompose in the water)
originate solely from pre-existing germs. If the germs are
destroyed (by heat, for example), the infusions remain sterile.
Spallanzani studied animal generation with great enthusiasm
and carried out numerous experiments on fertilization in frogs,
toads and dogs. He showed that fertilization cannot take place
without direct contact between the egg and the semen, thus
refuting the widespread belief that spermatozoa fertilize
an egg by means of a vapor known as the aura seminalis. He
also examined various physiological matters relating to the
circulation of blood: he made the observation, for example,
that blood flows from the arteries to the veins through the
capillaries in chicken embryos.
Leopoldo M.A. Caldani from Bologna (1725-1813), the anatomist
and physiologist who succeeded Morgagnis in Padua, was concerned
with the embryology of the nervous system. Caldani investigated
the adult nervous system, the chyliferous vessels, the organ
of hearing and the circulatory system. In the field of physiology,
he openly ascribed to Hallers theories on irritability. He
wrote two works: the Istituzioni di Anatomy [Fundamental principles
of Anatomy] (1787) and the Istituzioni di Fisiologia [Fundamental
principles of Physiology] (1787).
Felice Fontana (1730-1805), the great biologist and naturalist
from Trentino who became director of the Museo della Specola
(Observatory Museum) in Florence in 1771, was a near contemporary.
Fontana was responsible for identifying the structure of nerve
and muscle cell nuclei. He devoted himself mainly to a study
of microscopic nerve structure.
In 1775, another great Italian scientist was appointed professor
of anatomy in Acqui: V. Malacarne of Saluzzo (1744-1816).
Malacarne was mainly concerned with aesthesiology (study of
the sense organs) and neurology (study of the nervous system).
He investigated the central and the peripheral nervous systems.
The anatomist and surgeon G. B. Palletta (1747-1830) was a
contemporary of Malacarne. He mainly studied the structure
of the uterus and the tunica vaginalis testis (one of the
six layers forming the coating of the testis) in addition
to the buccinator or buccal nerve (which supplies the sensitive
nerve endings in the cheek).
Paolo Mascagni, another eminent Italian scientist (1752-1815)
taught anatomy, physiology and chemistry at the S. Maria Nuova
Hospital in Florence (part of the University of Pisa). Mascagni
carried out his most important scientific work on the lymphaticvessels.
In 1819, he published an Anatomy for use by students of painting
and sculpture. A general introduction to anatomy was published
in 1819. The year 1823 saw the publication of Anatomia Universa,
which Mascagni completed in 1815, the year of his death. This
work contains extremely fine illustration plates showing,
among other things, the lymphatic vessels, which the Italian
scientist investigated in depth.
Another contemporary of Mascagni was the great surgeon and
distinguished anatomist Antonio Scarpa (1752-1832), one of Morgagni's
disciples. He studied the vestibular ganglion (which bears
his name) and the nasopalatine nerve. He carried out extremely
interesting and detailed studies into the organs of hearing,
smell and sight. The anatomist gave his name to Scarpa's triangle,
located on the front of the thigh.
The French surgeon and physiologist M.F. Xavier Bichat (1771-1802),
who also lived between the Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries,
taught anatomy, physiology, surgical anatomy and pathological
anatomy. The story goes that in the Parisian hospital Hotel
Dieu, he managed to carry out more than six hundred autopsies
in a single winter (an autopsy is carried out with the aim
of finding changes in a cadaver and interpreting them in the
light of symptoms observed during the life of the patient).
A staunch upholder of the vitalist doctrine, Bichat believed
that life is made up of the collection of vital properties
which keep us from death. He outlined these theories brilliantly
in a work written in 1799: le Recherches physiologiques sur
la vie et la mort. The French scientist is unanimously considered
the founder of histology (the morphological study of tissues,
i.e. the constituent materials of the organs). Bichat was
responsible for human anatomy becoming less a purely descriptive
discipline and more a study of the intimate structure of organs
and tissues, both normal and diseased. Bichat identified 21
types of simple tissues, which he described in his most important
work: a general Anatomy dating from 1801.
|
|
|